推广 热搜:

最新英语六级冲刺改错模拟题2

   日期:2024-09-02     来源:www.xuduwan.com    浏览:342    
文章简介:最新六级冲刺改错模拟题2 这篇改错原文选自The Economist,八百字左右,压缩到了200多字,设计的题目完全根据考试知识点,困难程度高于考试真题。请同学们踊跃讨论!期望对大伙有帮助! The European Union had a...

最新六级冲刺改错模拟题2

这篇改错原文选自The Economist,八百字左右,压缩到了200多字,设计的题目完全根据考试知识点,困难程度高于考试真题。请同学们踊跃讨论!期望对大伙有帮助!

The European Union had approved a number of genetically            


modified crops until late 1998. But growing public concern

over its supposed environmental and health risks led several                       

EU countries to demand a moratorium on imports

of any new GM produce. By late 1999 there were enough such

country to block any new approvals of GM produce.                                   

   Last year, America filed a complaint at the WTO about the

moratorium, arguing that it was an illegal trade barrier

because there is no scientific base for  it.                                                                                 
     As more studies have been completed on the effects

of GM crops, the greens’ case for them has weakened.                               


Much evidence has emerged of health risks from eating                               

them. And, overall, the studies have shown that the

environmental effects on modified crops are not always                              


as serious as the greens claim. Nevertheless, environmentalists

continue to find fault of such studies and argue that                               


they are inconclusive.

   While Americans seem happy enough to consume food made

from GM crops, opinion polls continue to show that European

consumers dislike the idea. Europeans seem be taking the attitude                   

which , since there remains the slightest possibility of adverse                    

consequences and since it is clear how they, as consumers, benefit                  

from GM crops, they would rather not run the risk. 

分析:

1.  本题考查了大伙辨别代词所指的能力,its 指代genetically modified crops(为复数), 所以应该改成their;


2.  such country是指前面需要中止进口转基因农商品的某些欧盟国家, 所以应该改成复数;


3.  此处意为: 由于没科学依据支持中止, it 指the moratorium; base 基础, 基地, 依据地; basis 基础, 基本, 依据; 科学依据只能说scientific basis, 有些同学把base 后面的for 改

为 on , 应该是遭到了base on 这个短语的影响;


4. the greens = the environmentalists 环保主义者。 Case 论点,论据, case for 后面的them指GM crops, case for sth. 支持某物的论点,case against sth. 反对某物的论点(削弱了);


5. 逻辑错误,本句正常语序为Much evidence of health risks from eating them has emerged. 依据And, overall,  或后的语意,此行应该把much 改为little, 说明没什么征兆、依据表明吃GM crops对健康有哪些危险。


6. 本句的意思为:研究表明modified crops对环境导致的后果并没环保主义者所声称的那样紧急。 Environmental effects of modified crops ; 不少同学看到effects 以为后面肯定跟on 就错了。


7. find fault with 批评,找茬;


8. seem to be taking固定结构,be 不可以少;


9. taking the attitude that ..后为同位语从句,不可以用which;


10. 注意since 前面的and 表示前后语意一致。 由于欧洲人感觉仍然存在用GM food的不利后果,并且他们作为买家从GM food中会怎么样获得好处也不了解,所以他们不想冒风险。

 
打赏
 
更多>热门阅读

推荐图文
今日推荐
点击排行
网站首页  |  关于我们  |  联系方式  |  使用协议  |  版权隐私  |  网站地图  |  排名推广  |  广告服务  |  积分换礼  |  网站留言  |  RSS订阅  |  违规举报